![]() Endothelial dysfunction patients had nonsignificant more no-reflow (31.6% vs 7.1%, p-value: 0.06). ![]() Patients with normal endothelial function had a more myocardial blush grade (MBG) 3 (78.6% vs 26.5%, p value = 0.001) in comparison with more MBG 2 in those with endothelial dysfunction (41.9% vs 14.3%, p value = 0.001). One hundred and thirty-six patients (90.7%) had endothelial dysfunction. Also, they showed more endothelial dysfunction however, this difference was statistically nonsignificant (97.7% vs 87.7%, p = 0.055). ![]() No-reflow occurred in 44 patients (29.3%). According to FMD measured through brachial artery ultrasound, patients were divided based on their endothelial function into endothelial dysfunction versus normal endothelial function. Patients were divided according to coronary angiographic success into normal flow versus no-reflow groups. ![]() This study included 150 patients managed by the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after successful fibrinolysis.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |